Resources · Municipal

Managing Closed Session Records: A Guide for Municipal Administrators

Closed sessions present a records management challenge: the organisation needs to preserve a complete record of what was discussed and decided, while ensuring that content never appears in the public record. Managing both sides of that requirement — completeness and restriction — requires clear workflows and reliable access controls.

Why closed sessions require careful records management

Most provincial municipal legislation requires municipalities to maintain some form of record of their closed session proceedings, even though the content is confidential. The record serves as evidence of what was discussed and decided in camera — and may be subject to review by an ombudsman, inspector general, or court if a question arises about whether the closed session was properly conducted. At the same time, the content of closed session records must remain confidential — not published to the public portal, not accessible to staff without authorisation, and not released in response to access-to-information requests except where specific legislation permits or requires disclosure. This creates a records management challenge: how to maintain a complete, accurate, and auditable record of closed session content while ensuring it never reaches the wrong audience.

Common closed session records mistakes

Municipalities make several characteristic mistakes with closed session records. The first is failing to record closed sessions at all — relying on informal notes that cannot be verified or may be incomplete. The second is recording closed sessions using the same tools and workflows as open sessions without applying different access controls, resulting in closed session content appearing in publicly accessible archives. The third mistake is not maintaining a clear record of which portions of a meeting were conducted in closed session — making it difficult to demonstrate that the open and closed portions were properly separated. The fourth is not applying retention policies consistently to closed session records, either deleting them too quickly or keeping them accessible to users who no longer need access.

A better approach to closed session records

An effective closed session records workflow has four elements: (1) capturing a complete record of the closed session as it occurs, (2) applying access restrictions immediately and automatically, (3) maintaining a clear audit trail of who accessed the closed session record and when, and (4) applying retention policies consistently. Technology that supports Protected Session Mode allows recording to continue during the transition to closed session without manual file management, while automatically applying access restrictions from the moment the protected session begins. This eliminates the risk of closed session content accidentally entering the public record and provides a clear, auditable record of the session.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do municipalities have to record their closed sessions?
Requirements vary by province. Many provinces require some form of record of closed session proceedings. Municipalities should confirm their specific obligations under applicable legislation with their municipal solicitor.
Can closed session records be released under access to information requests?
This depends on applicable provincial access to information legislation, the nature of the closed session subject matter, and any exemptions that apply. Municipalities should consult their solicitor regarding specific disclosure requests.
How long should closed session records be retained?
Retention requirements vary by province and may depend on the nature of the closed session content. Municipalities should follow applicable records retention schedules and consult their records management advisor and solicitor.